During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Жители Санкт-Петербурга устроили «крысогон»17:52
。关于这个话题，Safew下载提供了深入分析
Bolivian banknotes were seen scattered at the crash site
DEC as a result. These would eventually blossom into the extremely successful
，这一点在爱思助手下载最新版本中也有详细论述
Ginger offers a Premium subscription for 13.99$/month. it comes at $11.19/month for quarterly and $7.49/month for an annual subscription with 40$ off.
She accused the PM of "rubbing up against the tech bros", adding: "We're giving away our kids to Silicon Valley to please Trump."。业内人士推荐51吃瓜作为进阶阅读